How to cite item

The effect of oral sucralfate on postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket

  
@article{AOE4604,
	author = {Luciana C. Silva and Fernando A. M. Herbella},
	title = {The effect of oral sucralfate on postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket},
	journal = {Annals of Esophagus},
	volume = {1},
	number = {0},
	year = {2018},
	keywords = {},
	abstract = {Background: A postprandial proximal gastric acidpocket (PPGAP) that escapes neutralization by food was demonstrated involunteers and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients. It is elusive;however, if this acid layer is morphologically best conceptualized as a realpocket or a film. This study aims to analyze the effect of oral sucralfateadministration on PPGAP to shed some light on PPGAP morphology and treatment. 
Methods: Twenty-six patients (mean age 51years, 19 females) were studied. A pull-through pH monitoring was performedfrom 5 cm below the lower border of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to theactual border in increments of 1 cm, in a fasting state, 10 min after a fattymeal and 10 min after oral sucralfate administration. PPGAP was defined by anacid reading (pH <4) in the proximal stomach between non-acid segmentsdistally (food) and proximally (proximal pH transition point). Standard 24 h pHmonitoring was performed for objective characterization of GERD. The protocolwas approved by local ethics committee. 
Results: PPGAP was not found in 15 patientsand these were excluded from the post-sucralfate analysis. After sucralfate,PPGAP increased in length in 5/11 (45%) patients; decreased in 2/11 patients(18%). In 3/11 (27%) patients PPGAP disappeared; in 1/11 (9%) PPGAP lengthremained equal. 
Conclusions: In conclusion,sucralfate altered PPGAP in more than 90% of the patients, supporting thetheory of an acid film. Sucralfate is, however, not an adequate treatment forPPGAP.},
	issn = {2616-2784},	url = {https://aoe.amegroups.org/article/view/4604}
}